JervExplore Atlanta on foot
A city built around driving, which makes covering it on foot a genuinely different problem — and makes the parts that do work for walking much more rewarding than they look.
Atlanta is the hardest kind of city to cover on foot, and it is worth being upfront about why: it was largely built around the car. Blocks are long, cul-de-sacs are everywhere, sidewalks stop and start, and several parts of the city are separated by infrastructure you simply cannot walk across.
None of that makes it a bad place to do this. It makes it a place where the approach matters more.
What makes it different
The street network is not a grid. Much of residential Atlanta is a dendritic pattern — arterials with branching subdivisions hanging off them, most ending in cul-de-sacs. On a fog map that is expensive: every dead end is an out-and-back, and a neighbourhood with forty of them takes far longer than its area suggests.
The interstates are walls. I-75, I-85 and I-20 cut the city into pieces with a limited number of crossings, and some of those crossings are unpleasant on foot. Plan around them rather than into them.
The tree canopy hides the shape. Atlanta is one of the most heavily forested large cities in the United States, and a satellite view badly understates how much street network is down there. Areas that look like woods from above are full of roads.
Where it works best
There is a lot of Atlanta that is excellent for this, and it is concentrated.
- The BeltLine. A former rail corridor converted to a multi-use trail, and the single best piece of walkable infrastructure in the city. It also connects neighbourhoods that are otherwise awkward to get between on foot, which makes it useful as a spine rather than just a destination.
- The intown neighbourhoods. Inman Park, Candler Park, Virginia-Highland, Grant Park, Old Fourth Ward, Cabbagetown. These predate the car, and they behave like the walkable grids they are.
- Decatur. Compact, gridded, and genuinely finishable as its own project.
- The parks. Piedmont, Grant, Freedom Park's trail network. Real ground, and the path networks are denser than the map suggests.
A strategy that actually works here
Use the car, and be unembarrassed about it. Atlanta is a driving city. Drive to a neighbourhood, park, cover it properly on foot, drive to the next one. Trying to cover it as one continuous walking project from your front door will mostly get you a map of arterial roads, which are the least interesting squares in the city.
Do neighbourhoods, not routes. Pick one, walk every street in it including the cul-de-sacs, and finish it. The dendritic layout punishes wandering and rewards systematic coverage — you are going to double back anyway, so plan for it.
Take the trails seriously. The BeltLine, the PATH network and the park trails cover ground that no street ever will, and they connect pieces of the map that are otherwise separate.
Watch the sidewalk. Coverage on foot in the outer neighbourhoods is genuinely inconsistent, and some arterials are not safe to walk. This is a real constraint, not a footnote.
The upside
Because Atlanta is hard to cover on foot, very little of it has been. The intown neighbourhoods are dense with short residential streets that essentially nobody walks end to end, and the trail network reaches places that never appear in anyone's route. If unclaimed ground is what you are after, a driving city is a target-rich environment.
Get the iPhone beta — free, through TestFlight — or open the web app in any browser. Your map starts blacked out either way.